
I am an avid sports fan. I truly cannot get enough of sports in my life. But when it comes to baseball, I have my hesitations, and always have.
Even when I was younger, baseball was the least favorite of my sports. I even stopped playing as early as junior high because I got to the point where I literally hated baseball. It was just too boring for me and I didn’t think it was very fun.
Outside of old school baseball fans who still claim that baseball is “America’s Pastime,” no longer do many Americans seem to care all that much about baseball - it only really carries much weight after the NBA Finals are over and everyone is just waiting for football season to begin. And I think Americans are justified in their thinking - baseball (MLB) just has too much working against it - the season is too long, its playoff season starts right as football begins, the draft is boring because the college market rarely puts players straight into the majors, the lack of salary cap kills most mid-market and below teams, there is no off-season hype (see draft), dominant players only have a chance to dominate a few times a game (hitters) or once every 5 games (pitchers), America’s best athletes have continued to drift largely towards football and basketball, and the game itself is simply not that entertaining. The one thing that seemed to keep baseball alive was its deep history and inherent statistical nature.
Well, as you could probably guess, with the culmination of the A-Rod scandal, my concern is that baseball can no longer live off its (questionable) history and (tarnished) stats.
The demise started about 10-15 years ago when, because of the obvious negatives I mentioned before, baseball had to somehow attract fans and attention. Since people love displays of dominance, what better way to draw attention to baseball than to accommodate an infestation of home runs. Smaller ball parks, juiced baseballs, and broken records - perfect. From this, we got to see the McGwire/Sosa home run chase, Bonds’ 73 home run season, and Bonds’ head increase in size by 68%. This seemed great to baseball at the time - attendance was up, they were making money, and everyone was happy.
But a few years ago (it seems like it was almost spurred by Jose Canseco), allegations of steroids and other banned substances became thrown around quite often, and the players we had idolized were suddenly being questioned by the government. Baseball probably knew it at the time, and we are probably figuring it out now, but this entire “performance enhancing drug” era is going to destroy baseball.
Just think about it: widely considered to be the best right-handed pitcher of all-time, Roger Clemens, is now literally a laughing stock; widely considered one of the best left-handed hitters of all-time (and certainly the best of our generation), Barry Bonds, is even more of a laughing stock. And now, the best player of our generation, Alex Rodriguez, has openly admitted to using full blown steroids for an extended period of time. Throw in guys like McGwire, Sosa, Palmiero, Giambi, Pettitte, Sheffield, Tejada……..this just reiterates how rampant the use of these PEDs was, and more importantly, how rampant it was among the league’s best players.
What makes all this even worse is that baseball knew all about this, effectively chose to do nothing about it, and attempted to sweep all this under the rug as much as possible. What the fans are now left with is a league with tarnished integrity, players with no credibility, a history which now must be questioned, and stats with little to no validity. Why would anyone stick around?
It is worth bringing up - is the discovery of baseball’s abuse of PEDs just “ahead of the curve” in respect to the other major sports? Maybe so, but I don’t really think that matters much. For one, in basketball, there would be very minimal use for any of that stuff, so there is no reason to think that would be a problem (until they create drugs that make you jump 12 inches higher). In football, though, obviously PEDs would make a huge difference, and my guess is that the use at least at some point was just as rampant as it was in baseball. But I think there are two points to be made here. First, I think the NFL did a much better job than the MLB of cracking down on it. And second, I will use a metaphor:
Take two cars, one is a cadillac, and the other is a corvette. The corvette prides itself in being fast and powerful, while the cadillac prides itself in being classy, luxurious, and “historical.” After awhile, people began to be drawn more to the speed and power of the corvette, and cadillac lost some customers. But within a few years, cadillacs were suddenly faster and more powerful than ever before. People questioned if the speed of the cadillac was legit, and wondered if they were using NOS in their engines to go faster. Cadillac denied for years that they used any NOS, but one day it got leaked that in fact, cadillac had been using NOS to increase the speed of their vehicles. If you are an owner of a cadillac, you are likely going to be furious that they used a banned substance to make your car go faster - it diminishes too much of the luxury and class of the car. But if you owned a corvette and found that NOS was used in your engine, how mad would you really be? You bought the car to go fast, and that’s exactly what it did. Yea, you would wish that it was totally legit, but hey, you wanted to go fast in the first place so you can’t really complain.
I think thats kind of how football/baseball is. Football fans are like corvette owners - we want to see speed and power and intensity, and the game fuels on those things. So what if we find out Shawne Merriman took steroids? He knocks the shit out of people and then goes crazy afterwards - that’s what I want to see. Am I happy he took steroids? Of course not. Does it make him look a little bit worse in my eyes? Sure. But the point is, because the game is built so much around the exact things that steroids can improve (speed and power), we almost expect players to take them, and when we find out that they did, it doesn’t really frustrate us all that much.
But a baseball fan is like a cadillac owner - they love the game for its history and statiscal nature (equivalent of “class”). Sure, they certainly enjoy when people hit long home runs, but the integrity of the game and stats is much more important than that. When they find out that not only the players, but the league as well, was compromising the integrity of the league just to draw more attention (go faster in the cadillac), they are pissed. The fringe fans who joined on during the home run boom (when cadillac made their cars faster), are likely to never come back because they feel so tricked, and you can bet that a few of the die-hards feel so cheated that they might venture elsewhere as well, at least attempting to honor baseball’s history by not supporting the very thing that has tarnished it.
I guess I honestly don’t believe that baseball will ever go away completely, but I would not be the least bit surprised if in 10 years or so, we no longer consider baseball as one of the “big 3.” As I mentioned, it already had too much working against it to begin with, and this A-Rod saga might just be the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Actually, now that I think about it, this is all Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux’s fault. We all dug the long ball.